[閒聊]所以其實是勞資問題吧?已回收
說到底 前幾次因為風雨不大
被認為"預測神準"的賴市長
不過是踏入推上神壇又再次殞落的輪迴罷了
但為何不放假的時候"大家"一同讚揚
當你讚揚預測神準不放假的同時
等同是跟資方站在同一陣線耶?
到底是人身安全重要還是神準重要
說到底放不放颱風假根本勞資問題
未來只要"要放就整天"而且"放錯不補班"
這樣就沒爭議了吧? 只是換大老闆們出來哀哀叫
這時候"大家"才更應該出來理直氣壯地爭取自己的權益不是?
然而既然把決定放假的權力交到政府手上
結果放錯假的時候大家除了去KTV、電影院
也沒有選擇跟放假決定機關一同承擔去對抗資方
站在勞方資方都有投票權的立場上
會搞得這麼斤斤計較不是很意外吧...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.205.14.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tainan/M.1473864342.A.16F.html
推
09/14 22:45, , 1F
09/14 22:45, 1F
推
09/14 22:48, , 2F
09/14 22:48, 2F
推
09/14 22:48, , 3F
09/14 22:48, 3F
推
09/14 22:49, , 4F
09/14 22:49, 4F
推
09/14 22:50, , 5F
09/14 22:50, 5F
→
09/14 22:50, , 6F
09/14 22:50, 6F
→
09/14 22:50, , 7F
09/14 22:50, 7F
因為中華文化一直對領導人有一種"明君期望"
希望他們如同唐太宗清康熙一般處事聖明知人善任
但那是因為你沒辦法決定誰是皇帝
民主時代還有這種期待實在很詭異...
而且沒有任何"人"是可信賴的 創造一個均衡的制度比較實在
所以先造神然後再毀滅他 變成台灣政壇的輪迴
※ 編輯: blackwoods (123.205.14.9), 09/14/2016 22:55:00
→
09/14 22:51, , 8F
09/14 22:51, 8F
→
09/14 22:51, , 9F
09/14 22:51, 9F
→
09/14 22:51, , 10F
09/14 22:51, 10F
→
09/14 22:52, , 11F
09/14 22:52, 11F
→
09/14 22:52, , 12F
09/14 22:52, 12F
→
09/14 22:52, , 13F
09/14 22:52, 13F
→
09/14 22:53, , 14F
09/14 22:53, 14F
→
09/14 22:54, , 15F
09/14 22:54, 15F
推
09/14 22:55, , 16F
09/14 22:55, 16F
推
09/14 22:55, , 17F
09/14 22:55, 17F
→
09/14 22:55, , 18F
09/14 22:55, 18F
→
09/14 22:55, , 19F
09/14 22:55, 19F
→
09/14 22:55, , 20F
09/14 22:55, 20F
→
09/14 22:56, , 21F
09/14 22:56, 21F
推
09/14 22:56, , 22F
09/14 22:56, 22F
我今天不是要討論風力問題 因為那是"這次颱風"
如果只以今天的狀況 結論只是每次個案處理
這樣還是把決定的壓力丟到市府
我希望討論的是未來通案處理概念
下面那篇回應的通通放無薪假不失為一個平衡手段
再來天氣因素多變 預報也不盡然完全準
最後 當有錯放假時 媒體一邊放著百貨公司KTV人潮洶湧的時候
也同時一邊報著業界損失多少多少的時候
請不要只想到"賺到一天假" 否則你未來有可能損失更多
就是像這次颱風的狀況...
→
09/14 22:56, , 23F
09/14 22:56, 23F
→
09/14 22:57, , 24F
09/14 22:57, 24F
→
09/14 22:59, , 25F
09/14 22:59, 25F
※ 編輯: blackwoods (123.205.14.9), 09/14/2016 23:04:11
推
09/14 23:03, , 26F
09/14 23:03, 26F
→
09/14 23:03, , 27F
09/14 23:03, 27F
推
09/14 23:07, , 28F
09/14 23:07, 28F
推
09/14 23:10, , 29F
09/14 23:10, 29F
→
09/14 23:11, , 30F
09/14 23:11, 30F
→
09/14 23:11, , 31F
09/14 23:11, 31F
→
09/14 23:12, , 32F
09/14 23:12, 32F
推
09/14 23:13, , 33F
09/14 23:13, 33F
噓
09/14 23:13, , 34F
09/14 23:13, 34F
→
09/14 23:14, , 35F
09/14 23:14, 35F
推
09/14 23:15, , 36F
09/14 23:15, 36F
→
09/14 23:15, , 37F
09/14 23:15, 37F
→
09/14 23:15, , 38F
09/14 23:15, 38F
→
09/14 23:16, , 39F
09/14 23:16, 39F
→
09/14 23:16, , 40F
09/14 23:16, 40F
→
09/14 23:17, , 41F
09/14 23:17, 41F
→
09/14 23:17, , 42F
09/14 23:17, 42F
推
09/14 23:19, , 43F
09/14 23:19, 43F
→
09/14 23:20, , 44F
09/14 23:20, 44F
推
09/14 23:20, , 45F
09/14 23:20, 45F
→
09/14 23:20, , 46F
09/14 23:20, 46F
→
09/14 23:21, , 47F
09/14 23:21, 47F
推
09/14 23:21, , 48F
09/14 23:21, 48F
→
09/14 23:21, , 49F
09/14 23:21, 49F
推
09/14 23:21, , 50F
09/14 23:21, 50F
→
09/14 23:22, , 51F
09/14 23:22, 51F
→
09/14 23:22, , 52F
09/14 23:22, 52F
→
09/14 23:22, , 53F
09/14 23:22, 53F
→
09/14 23:22, , 54F
09/14 23:22, 54F
→
09/14 23:23, , 55F
09/14 23:23, 55F
→
09/14 23:24, , 56F
09/14 23:24, 56F
推
09/14 23:25, , 57F
09/14 23:25, 57F
→
09/14 23:32, , 58F
09/14 23:32, 58F
推
09/14 23:37, , 59F
09/14 23:37, 59F
→
09/14 23:38, , 60F
09/14 23:38, 60F
→
09/14 23:38, , 61F
09/14 23:38, 61F
→
09/14 23:38, , 62F
09/14 23:38, 62F
推
09/14 23:38, , 63F
09/14 23:38, 63F
推
09/14 23:53, , 64F
09/14 23:53, 64F
→
09/14 23:54, , 65F
09/14 23:54, 65F
→
09/14 23:54, , 66F
09/14 23:54, 66F
→
09/14 23:55, , 67F
09/14 23:55, 67F
→
09/14 23:56, , 68F
09/14 23:56, 68F
→
09/14 23:57, , 69F
09/14 23:57, 69F
→
09/15 00:21, , 70F
09/15 00:21, 70F
推
09/15 00:40, , 71F
09/15 00:40, 71F
噓
09/15 04:15, , 72F
09/15 04:15, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
Tainan 近期熱門文章
PTT台灣在地區 即時熱門文章