[問題] 為何瓦斯鋼瓶使用超過一年,檢驗費要自付已刪文
因為瓦斯用一年
剛叫瓦斯結果被多收檢驗費..
後來想想覺得很奇怪
這筆檢驗費是新規定而衍生的費用
假設我照瓦斯行所說,一年內叫瓦斯就不收
但瓦斯行那時拿到我的鋼瓶
無論如何,瓦斯行勢必要送驗阿
因此那時檢驗費就是瓦斯行付吧?
所以現在這理由就很奇怪
為何本來就要送驗的鋼瓶
超過一年是消費者付檢驗費?
一年內鋼瓶瓦斯行送驗不用錢嗎?
高雄鄉民各位情況也是雷同嗎?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HTC_D816x.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.40.170.217
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1504437999.A.2D0.html
→
09/03 19:28, , 1F
09/03 19:28, 1F
我不叫外送的XD
推
09/03 19:29, , 2F
09/03 19:29, 2F
當下換完才被收,且當時不清楚是不是如我想得這樣,就先付了
→
09/03 19:30, , 3F
09/03 19:30, 3F
→
09/03 19:31, , 4F
09/03 19:31, 4F
那簡單說就是騙消費者的錢啊,感覺很差,看新聞好像高雄流行這樣?
※ 編輯: papapapa5566 (114.40.152.180), 09/03/2017 20:09:54
→
09/03 19:55, , 5F
09/03 19:55, 5F
→
09/03 19:55, , 6F
09/03 19:55, 6F
→
09/03 19:55, , 7F
09/03 19:55, 7F
→
09/03 19:55, , 8F
09/03 19:55, 8F
mp大的方式是我之後考慮的方式
其實本來用完的瓦斯桶,會有剩餘一點,但一般消費者也不會跟店家計較退費
既然大家都要算這麼精,之後我可能就請瓦斯行秤重,把多餘的瓦斯退費吧
→
09/03 19:59, , 9F
09/03 19:59, 9F
→
09/03 19:59, , 10F
09/03 19:59, 10F
按照第七條,以交易日一年算,所以叫你半年叫一次的,似乎頗黑
推
09/03 20:01, , 11F
09/03 20:01, 11F
→
09/03 20:04, , 12F
09/03 20:04, 12F
→
09/03 20:04, , 13F
09/03 20:04, 13F
→
09/03 20:04, , 14F
09/03 20:04, 14F
→
09/03 20:04, , 15F
09/03 20:04, 15F
→
09/03 20:04, , 16F
09/03 20:04, 16F
→
09/03 20:04, , 17F
09/03 20:04, 17F
瓦斯行似乎本身就是壟斷的特性,很難不叫
也難怪高雄幾乎沒店家想立這種契約(台灣特產,高雄特多)
推
09/03 20:06, , 18F
09/03 20:06, 18F
→
09/03 20:06, , 19F
09/03 20:06, 19F
→
09/03 20:06, , 20F
09/03 20:06, 20F
→
09/03 20:06, , 21F
09/03 20:06, 21F
→
09/03 20:06, , 22F
09/03 20:06, 22F
→
09/03 20:06, , 23F
09/03 20:06, 23F
→
09/03 20:06, , 24F
09/03 20:06, 24F
不管我一個月叫一次或幾千次,瓦斯鋼瓶每年就是要送檢驗一次
因此瓦斯行就是有一筆檢驗費用支出,這沒錯吧?
而這筆固定費用,卻說因為你少用,叫少用的人負擔,這說法你接受?
→
09/03 20:07, , 25F
09/03 20:07, 25F
→
09/03 20:07, , 26F
09/03 20:07, 26F
所以本人都持著良幣驅逐劣幣的心態,該想法子了
※ 編輯: papapapa5566 (114.40.152.180), 09/03/2017 20:33:42
噓
09/03 20:16, , 27F
09/03 20:16, 27F
推
09/03 20:26, , 28F
09/03 20:26, 28F
→
09/03 20:26, , 29F
09/03 20:26, 29F
→
09/03 20:26, , 30F
09/03 20:26, 30F
→
09/03 20:26, , 31F
09/03 20:26, 31F
→
09/03 20:26, , 32F
09/03 20:26, 32F
→
09/03 20:26, , 33F
09/03 20:26, 33F
→
09/03 21:10, , 34F
09/03 21:10, 34F
→
09/03 21:10, , 35F
09/03 21:10, 35F
→
09/03 21:10, , 36F
09/03 21:10, 36F
→
09/03 21:10, , 37F
09/03 21:10, 37F
→
09/03 21:12, , 38F
09/03 21:12, 38F
→
09/03 21:12, , 39F
09/03 21:12, 39F
→
09/03 21:12, , 40F
09/03 21:12, 40F
→
09/03 21:12, , 41F
09/03 21:12, 41F
→
09/03 21:12, , 42F
09/03 21:12, 42F
→
09/03 21:29, , 43F
09/03 21:29, 43F
→
09/03 21:29, , 44F
09/03 21:29, 44F
→
09/03 21:29, , 45F
09/03 21:29, 45F
→
09/03 21:29, , 46F
09/03 21:29, 46F
推
09/03 22:56, , 47F
09/03 22:56, 47F
→
09/03 22:56, , 48F
09/03 22:56, 48F
推
09/03 23:08, , 49F
09/03 23:08, 49F
→
09/03 23:08, , 50F
09/03 23:08, 50F
→
09/03 23:09, , 51F
09/03 23:09, 51F
→
09/03 23:09, , 52F
09/03 23:09, 52F
→
09/03 23:09, , 53F
09/03 23:09, 53F
推
09/03 23:12, , 54F
09/03 23:12, 54F
推
09/03 23:45, , 55F
09/03 23:45, 55F
→
09/03 23:45, , 56F
09/03 23:45, 56F
推
09/04 07:44, , 57F
09/04 07:44, 57F
→
09/04 07:44, , 58F
09/04 07:44, 58F
→
09/04 08:59, , 59F
09/04 08:59, 59F
→
09/04 08:59, , 60F
09/04 08:59, 60F
→
09/04 08:59, , 61F
09/04 08:59, 61F
→
09/04 08:59, , 62F
09/04 08:59, 62F
→
09/04 08:59, , 63F
09/04 08:59, 63F
→
09/04 09:01, , 64F
09/04 09:01, 64F
噓
09/04 12:08, , 65F
09/04 12:08, 65F
推
09/04 16:36, , 66F
09/04 16:36, 66F
→
09/04 16:36, , 67F
09/04 16:36, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):
Kaohsiung 近期熱門文章
PTT台灣在地區 即時熱門文章